Authentifia
Submit a case

Eyewear

Checking an eyewear retailer

Eyewear is the segment where authenticity is least often the real question and compliance most often is. Almost all branded frames are made under licence by a handful of industrial groups, so the name on the temple does not identify the manufacturer. What is worth verifying is therefore not the frame but the retailer, and its ability to answer if something is wrong.

148 retailer profiles in this category

The name on the temple is not the maker

Most frames carrying a fashion house's name are produced under licence by specialist groups, which also own several brands outright. A perfectly genuine frame may therefore never have been made by the house whose name it bears, entirely lawfully and by contract. This is why an authentication request sent to the fashion house usually produces no useful answer.

Prescription lenses carry a separate liability

A frame is an accessory; a corrective lens is a class I medical device under European regulation 2017/745. A seller placing corrective lenses on the market takes on a liability quite unlike that of selling non-corrective sunglasses. For a buyer this changes the nature of the remedy if something is defective, and it is a reason to check who the retailer is before buying rather than after.

A sector where the activity code misleads

The August 2026 survey found that British opticians most often register under a health code rather than a retail code, unlike their French counterparts. The activity code check, which elsewhere reveals a site publishing its web agency's number, is therefore weakly discriminating here. It is an example of a rule that holds by segment rather than by country.

Each profile cites the source consulted and the date it was collected. A missing number means it could not be verified, never that it is doubtful.

Germany

France

United Kingdom

Italy

Spain

Switzerland

Other categories

Ready-to-wearLeather goodsFootwearJewellery and watchesLuxury multibrandSportFull directory